PropertyValue
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Cartilage
rdfs:comment
  • Uncyclomasters: I am a noob and I have written an article. May it please you. Or not. Help me see all of my flaws so I have a reason to finally put that toaster in the bathtub tonight. Ratfactor (talk) 22:15, July 13, 2012 (UTC) Wow, thanks for the review Simsilikesims! 23:26, December 3, 2012 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
Mcomment
  • Feature! As you should be able to tell from the fact that this article was one of the first featured without a proper pee review. Maybe I was influenced by that fact, but I enjoyed it just the same, and more than some features that I've read.
Pcomment
  • No formatting flaws, and this article seems well written.
Icomment
  • The images are related to things that really do have cartilage in them, such as ears, and sharks. The captions are even better, which is hard to do given these quality images.
Pscore
  • 10
Ccomment
  • This is a mostly original concept of using anatomy to be funny and brilliantly fleshed out.
Cscore
  • 8
Hcomment
  • This article was featured for several very good reasons. Lots of fun silliness here, a bit of innuendo , and the silliness is properly dispersed throughout the entire article, it doesn't stop after the first section as is so common elsewhere.
Iscore
  • 10
Hscore
  • 9
Fcomment
  • Well written, funny, well formatted, great images. What isn't to like?
dbkwik:uncyclopedia/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
Signature
  • --12-01
abstract
  • Uncyclomasters: I am a noob and I have written an article. May it please you. Or not. Help me see all of my flaws so I have a reason to finally put that toaster in the bathtub tonight. Ratfactor (talk) 22:15, July 13, 2012 (UTC) Wow, thanks for the review Simsilikesims! 23:26, December 3, 2012 (UTC)