| rdfs:comment | - I put the cantha and tyria subs for future consideration but it takes up too much space and i'm sure we can do that just as easily in future chapters. Number two is easier to read imo — Skuld Image:Monk-icon-small.png 03:36, 12 July 2006 (CDT) I think continent is not important, but campaign is. How about: Back to the bullet point thing, why use them at all? If you need to go to another line use instead, same thing, no bullet. --Rainith 11:16, 26 September 2006 (CDT)
|
| abstract | - I put the cantha and tyria subs for future consideration but it takes up too much space and i'm sure we can do that just as easily in future chapters. Number two is easier to read imo — Skuld Image:Monk-icon-small.png 03:36, 12 July 2006 (CDT) I think continent is not important, but campaign is. How about: Sigh... in general I hate putting bullet points inside tables, the wikicode is just ugly, yet here I am... -User:PanSola (talk to the Image:Follower of Lyssa.png) 06:08, 12 July 2006 (CDT) How does not using bullet points inside tables make wikicode look ugly? Without them, the generally structure of the whole thing ain't really that much different right? Using tables always makes things look complex. --Ab.Er.Rant @ User:Aberrant80 (msg) 06:19, 12 July 2006 (CDT) I meant using bullet points inside tables make the wikicode look ugly (or messy). This is because the bullet point has to start as the first character of a new line. -User:PanSola (talk to the Image:Follower of Lyssa.png) 03:24, 14 July 2006 (CDT) I personally don't think tables look good for this at all, especially seeing as the wiki is becoming tableholics. That said, I'm all for Skuld's proposition. Possibly in the form Name (Location, Campaign), but no tables. — Galil Image:Ranger-icon-small.png 14:59, 27 August 2006 (CDT) A month later, but I don't really care, but deciding this is good. Skuld wasn't proposing using a table, he was just using tables to show which was in use and which was proposed. I also hate the "before it's unlocked" part since it's ugly and people are ignoring it anyway. If they don't already understand how the unlocking/availability works that notice isn't enough. --Fyren 03:42, 26 September 2006 (CDT) the "before it's unlocked" might not be sufficiently enough, but I think it is much better than NOT having it there. Peopel who didnt realize who things work before, might at least be curious and click on the link and learn something. Every little bit helps, and I added that part in beause I was getting sick of reverting stuff. I *think* it's been better lately. -User:PanSola (talk to the Image:Follower of Lyssa.png) 04:12, 26 September 2006 (CDT) I don't think it's been better lately. --Fyren 04:19, 26 September 2006 (CDT) Back to the bullet point thing, why use them at all? If you need to go to another line use instead, same thing, no bullet. --Rainith 11:16, 26 September 2006 (CDT) Br = ugly, bullets = easier to read. Why use html > wikicode? — Skuld 11:21, 26 September 2006 (CDT) If there's no hierarchy involving the campaign in some way, I agree that there's no need for bullets. I also agree that HTML is pretty ugly in wikitext, so if there'll be no bullets, just insert blank lines to get the final output to be what you want. --Fyren 11:25, 26 September 2006 (CDT) I just rewrote the S&F and stuck in my preferred formatting for acquisition. Consider it my proposal for this. Basically, for core skills it's what Skuld has in his top table, but with campaign names instead of continents. For non-core skills, the campaign isn't an issue, so it looks like his second table. Of note, I also dropped the phrase "before it's unlocked" since people are still doing it to the articles which have it. Any decline is much more likely to be due to people not playing Prophecies than the warning. The warning does not clarify the situation to people who don't already understand how skill trainers work. --Fyren 06:36, 18 November 2006 (CST)
|
