| rdfs:comment | - Featured 03:12, 25 June 2006 (UTC) NOM YES! --PiOfFive 16:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* Against. Funny, but if the head actually looked like a cartoon... it'd probably by a for. 17:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* Comment: That's the point; the heads for all of the pictures in the Calvin and Hobbes article are just stuck on there. --§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ 20:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* For I debated nominating this myself. Simple but hilarious. 17:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* For. 18:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* For, but.. isn't this image the one on the Main Page next to the featured article? Is there still a point in making the image featured? I only vote for cause it's funny, though.--DiZ 19:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* Comment All featured images (except ones that get dropped via PFP) ge
|
| abstract | - Featured 03:12, 25 June 2006 (UTC) NOM YES! --PiOfFive 16:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* Against. Funny, but if the head actually looked like a cartoon... it'd probably by a for. 17:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* Comment: That's the point; the heads for all of the pictures in the Calvin and Hobbes article are just stuck on there. --§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ 20:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* For I debated nominating this myself. Simple but hilarious. 17:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* For. 18:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* For, but.. isn't this image the one on the Main Page next to the featured article? Is there still a point in making the image featured? I only vote for cause it's funny, though.--DiZ 19:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* Comment All featured images (except ones that get dropped via PFP) get a permanent spot in the image rotation, so even after they've actually been "featured" they'll appear on the front page every now and then. So yeah, there is a point, though the concern that the image might be featured a bit too soon after the article is valid. 20:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* Comment Possibly not original. This is what §ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ had to say about it when he uploaded it. "Thanks! I had originally scanned it for my myspace a long time ago (because calvin and hobbes is one of my favorite comics and I'm an atheist) and thought it would be funny here." Not sure how much of it was scanned and edited since then and whatnot (Like, if the head just got stuck on now, it's probably original enough). I believe all the other images in the article are original though. --monika 21:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* Comment: Sorry, I failed to mention that I stuck the John Calvin head on later when I put it on Uncyclopedia. I meant just the image of the strip, not the image above. --§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ 21:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* Good enough for me. --monika 23:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* Comment Needs clean-up. The ragged edges, etc. Then I'll reconsider 21:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* Comment: I fixed the hat, which, I think, was the most ragged-est edge of them all. Dunno if its big enough of an improvement, and it might be too blurry now. --§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ 22:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* For. 21:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* For. Of course, again. -- Imrealized 22:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
* For Awesome. -- 00:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
* For I was reluctant to vote for myself, but I'm following Some User's example on the image above. I, like him, have never had a featured image. --§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ 00:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
* FeatureUncyclopedian 01:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
* For, for obvious reasons.-- 16:33, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
* For, it's very good! Barmymoo 16:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
* Comment: ^ Probably a sock... just to let everyone know and embarrass the hell out of whoever did it. 19:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
* For. It's predestinated for greatness. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 01:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
* Against I like calvin and hobbes as much as anyone, but I don't think the picture is extremely funny. -- 02:31, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
* OH, HECK YEAH, FOR! Any reference to the Great Snow Demons must make the front page. tested 20:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
* OH HECK USE PFP, SMART PANTS --Witty Guy bitch at me 23:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
|
