| Property | Value |
|---|
| rdfs:label | - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnScripts:Noah's Ark
|
| rdfs:comment | - 20:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Additional comments per request: Well, to be honest, I don't have a whole load to add here. It's a good article. I laughed. I did, however, pine for more pictures - the one you have is good and so forth, but after that, it's a lot of white page with text and nothing to break it up. How's about a house with a dirty great boat out the back for starters? By my calculations you need at least another 2-3 good images, or 4-5 OK-ish in a decent light ones. Oh, and I can confirm it is definitely not pants. -- 22:14, Feb 25
|
| dcterms:subject | |
| Mcomment | |
| Pcomment | - End all of your sentences with punctuation, for consistency. I found one minor spelling error.
|
| Icomment | - Obviously, there's only one, but it is quite effective as a summary of the article. However, an image or two more couldn't hurt.
|
| Pscore | |
| Ccomment | - Making fun of the Bible isn't exactly original, but this doesn't make fun of religion so much as it is simply a funny version of a Bible story, which keeps it fresh.
|
| Cscore | |
| Mscore | |
| Hcomment | - Wherever possible, the humor should be more extreme. For example,
*"No, you know I'm fifty-seven days sober!" should be a much shorter amount of time. Like, 4 hours.
*"Mrs. Noah takes a pill from her pocket and swallows it whole." Mrs. Noah should swallow a whole bottle of pills and pass out.
*etc.
There were also some truly lol moments in there. What made me laugh hardest was:
Nice work.
|
| Iscore | |
| Hscore | |
| Fcomment | - Overall very good, and VFHable with a few minor changes.
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedia/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
| Signature | |
| abstract | - 20:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Additional comments per request: Well, to be honest, I don't have a whole load to add here. It's a good article. I laughed. I did, however, pine for more pictures - the one you have is good and so forth, but after that, it's a lot of white page with text and nothing to break it up. How's about a house with a dirty great boat out the back for starters? By my calculations you need at least another 2-3 good images, or 4-5 OK-ish in a decent light ones. I made a couple of minor spelling type tweaks because I'm kinda sad like that, but this is the kind of thing I hate - an article I have few suggestions to improve. Darn you, I'll look like I'm losing my touch! Tell you what - let me know when you've added a few more pics, and I'll give it the nom it should deserve at that point. Unless, of course, you're not interested in a nom... Oh, and I can confirm it is definitely not pants. -- 22:14, Feb 25
|
