| Property | Value |
|---|
| rdf:type | |
| rdfs:label | - Forum:CT Archive/New ship and vehicle infobox templates
|
| rdfs:comment | - I just edited to include all the fields people thought up on the test articles like A-wing. It works beautifully. I think we may be pretty much done, except for some aesthetic details, or any additional fields anyone wants to add. —Darth Culator (talk) 06:28, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
|
| Era | |
| Length | |
| MGLT | |
| OtherSystems | |
| shield gen | |
| hdsystem | - Billybob's Drive Yards Penguin 64 hyperdrive motivator
|
| Hyperdrive | - Class 2
- Backup Class 10
- Class 0.3, Backup class 40
|
| Skeleton | |
| max accel | |
| Consumables | |
| dbkwik:starwars/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
| Complement | |
| Power | |
| Affiliation | |
| Role | |
| Name | - Executor-class Star Dreadnought
- Bullet-class Box With Working Bulltes
- That-class Box With Nothing
- This-class Box With Everything
|
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>length | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>era | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>passengers | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>affiliation | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>width | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>role | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>hull | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>othersystems | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>height | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>armament | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>consumables | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>hdsystem | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>hyperdrive | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>manufacturer | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>complement | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>class | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>acceleration | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>crew | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>mglt | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>airspeed | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>powerplant | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>engine | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>skeleton | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>capacity | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>shields | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>model | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>name | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>line | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>poweroutput | |
| </nowiki><br>
<nowiki>image | |
| Width | |
| Line | |
| Max Speed | |
| Model | - Executor-class Star Dreadnought
- Bob-class Banana Cheese
- French-class Outrageous Accent
|
| Height | |
| Manufacturer | |
| Capacity | |
| Class | - Star Dreadnought
- Things—Stuff
|
| poweroutput | |
| Passengers | |
| Engine | - Jimbo's Stardrive GoFastTurnQuick engines
|
| Hull | |
| Crew | |
| Armament | - 1
- 37
- 612
- 5000
- *1 cow catapult
*Something else
|
| abstract | - I just edited to include all the fields people thought up on the test articles like A-wing. It works beautifully. I think we may be pretty much done, except for some aesthetic details, or any additional fields anyone wants to add. —Darth Culator (talk) 06:28, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
* OK, here's another puzzler. Look at Executor-class Star Dreadnought and see if you can figure out why some boxes have a different style of bullets. "Complement" and "Crew" are right next to each other, and as far as I can tell they're formatted the same, but one has square bullets and one has round ones. Same with "Role(s)" and "Era(s)". —Darth Culator (talk) 14:34, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
* Hmm, now that's interesting... The items don't get properly enclosed in ul tags, looks like a MediaWiki bug... I'll try substing the template and seeing what's the problem. - Sikon [Talk] 16:29, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
* I fixed the bullets, but unfortunately the rows grew a bit higher. - Sikon [Talk] 16:41, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
* I was playing with raw HTML in a preview page again to try to force the CSS to obey me, and it wasn't working at all. I think the site just likes you more. :-) Anyway, I don't think the spacing is a problem. I like it. I think VT-16 already liked it even with broken bullets. I'm not entirely sure how a "Consensus track" works, but I think we really are just about done here. —Darth Culator (talk) 16:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
* Well, all I did was added a linebreak before the right column content (so that the first bullet isn't an asterisk) and later a linebreak after (to comply with MediaWiki quirks for closing li/ul tags). I don't mind closing the discussion, I think we ended up having a functional template. - Sikon [Talk] 17:15, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
|
