| Property | Value |
|---|
| rdfs:label | - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Hipster
|
| rdfs:comment | - I tried to cover all the hipster bases as only a hipster could. Then, I tried doing it again when the first article became completely irrelevant. 21:17, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
| dcterms:subject | |
| Mcomment | - Props for name-dropping Deerhoof . You get a ten for that.
|
| Pcomment | - The brevity of some of the subsections really captures the dismissive superiority of the hipster. But some sections could be fleshed out a little to make it more visually appealing. The short sections on hashtags and liberal arts work well, but I think the chillwave section could be a little longer.
|
| Icomment | - The images are pretty standard, but they get the job done. I really like the picture of the keffiyeh dude, it's funny even out of the context of the article. Captions are all pretty good too
|
| Pscore | |
| Ccomment | - This is where the strength of the article really lies. A first-person narrative of a hipster talking about hipsters. Great.
|
| Cscore | |
| Mscore | |
| Hcomment | - This article is excellent. It's really comprehensive and pulls off a really hard thing to do; being original about mocking hipsters. Usually I'm annoyed by hipster-mockery but this actually made me laugh, particularly the bits about vinyl and the liberal arts, and the use of italics throughout. Also, you pulled off the 'articles written in the style of their subject' better than 99% of that type of article. No criticisms here. Only one point off because there weren't any real gut-busting moments; nevertheless, consistently funny.
|
| Iscore | |
| Hscore | |
| Fcomment | - This is one of the better articles on here that I've read in awhile. I'm gonna go ahead and VFH it if you don't mind. Might make a few small edits here and there to flesh it out a little.
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedia/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
| Signature | |
| abstract | - I tried to cover all the hipster bases as only a hipster could. Then, I tried doing it again when the first article became completely irrelevant. 21:17, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
