PropertyValue
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Battle of Baecula
rdfs:comment
  • After Scipio’s surprise attack and capture of Carthago Nova, the three Carthaginian armies in Iberia remained separated, and their generals at odds with each other, thus giving the Romans a chance to deal with them one by one. Early in 208 BC, Scipio moved against Hasdrubal, whose force wintered at Baecula, on the upper reaches of the river Baetis (modern day Guadalquivir).
owl:sameAs
Strength
  • 25000
  • 35000
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:military/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
Partof
  • the Second Punic War
Date
  • 208
Commander
Casualties
  • 2000
  • 10000
  • About 6,000 killed,
Result
  • Roman victory; Hasdrubal departed Iberia without sufficient force to march on Italy immediately
combatant
  • 12
  • 25
Place
  • Baecula , present-day Spain
Conflict
  • Battle of Baecula
abstract
  • After Scipio’s surprise attack and capture of Carthago Nova, the three Carthaginian armies in Iberia remained separated, and their generals at odds with each other, thus giving the Romans a chance to deal with them one by one. Early in 208 BC, Scipio moved against Hasdrubal, whose force wintered at Baecula, on the upper reaches of the river Baetis (modern day Guadalquivir). Upon learning the approach of the Romans, Hasdrubal shifted his camp to a strong defensive position — a high and deep plateau south of Baecula, protected by ravines on the flanks and the river to the front and rear. Moreover the plateau was formed into two steps, on which Hasdrubal posted his light troops on the lower one and his main camp behind. After his arrival, Scipio at first was uncertain how to attack such a formidable position, but concerned that the other two Carthaginian armies might take advantage of his inaction and join with Hasdrubal, he took action on the third day.