This HTML5 document contains 25 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/KsAP1Tm_xVPloNk0hDo5IQ==
n24http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n26http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/PgfGYo9GoNJS66kx3IoxGA==
n19http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/suyyUtdfnDLehaim4G9-XA==
n28http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/QFnV8mvuroJkazZ62kKK3A==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/O0zCUUxIMKruQE9LnitCnQ==
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/tIVssddAwtK0q8sPBkuUTA==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/JI4krIqL1GyBuXZJfx2XWw==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/s5kvrOq6eEbzSeFiS3KtJA==
n16http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/VxHhNZehKrjzdmIc2gls1g==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n22http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/xoykDFxJFBgF02W_HRnEzw==
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Y3Ztg0jUM48IvTtZpGFPDA==
n30http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/tufdZQKYWgehOTJpgE4N3g==
n18http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/g3L2drbCL-s8GiEOiaSUBA==
n20http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/z_TWAhL0caPDz90VOA2khA==
n21http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/i8tiFZYDfBmkJyuQ_MVZ1Q==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/dq5BXkyK2a8gi5bEnOnaaw==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n15http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/thatguywiththeglasses/property/
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/t8vLvS3RN9VWK6Ofv-GWGA==
n29http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/nPLAObyrRL-iGQuAG5xrDg==
n23http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/W5dVJOTMrWWk0kZDvOoJqQ==
n27http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/2_BOtlZONuFtW24JzHKNqQ==
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ti_o9q4pTkBAQszkkd0iCA==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/_pSaLlrMhsa1TahB4d6dNA==
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/GTMTU1uECQhyO8e8Aao1MA==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n17http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/4YHQhxbci-uA-yCm9cWz6w==
n25http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/XzugoYg2bYmMP5DhGMI2kg==
Subject Item
n13:
n17:
n2:
Subject Item
n2:
rdf:type
n22:
rdfs:label
Top Five LEAST Awful Disney Sequels
rdfs:comment
NCh: Last year... (realizes that last year was only a week ago) ...last week, I labored through every single Disney direct-to-video sequel and brought you a, list of the ones I considered the top ten worst, ‘cause people love lists, they love Disney and they love the word “worst”. Imagine that. But, this did lead to some people inquiring as to what I considered to be the, “best” (images of the word “BEST” appears). Problem with the word “best” is that it implies, “good” or, “warrants existing”. (Clips of the multiple Disney Sequels)
dcterms:subject
n4: n8: n10: n14: n25:
n17:
n20:
n7:
2012-01-15
n26:
Next Review
n5:
1205.0
n9:
Released
n18:
n19:
n21:
Running Time
n11:
Link
n12:
n13:
n30:
Previous Review
n27:
The Top Five LEAST Awful Disney Sequels
n15:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n16: n23:
n29:
320
n28:
Least awful disney sequels nch.jpg
n24:abstract
NCh: Last year... (realizes that last year was only a week ago) ...last week, I labored through every single Disney direct-to-video sequel and brought you a, list of the ones I considered the top ten worst, ‘cause people love lists, they love Disney and they love the word “worst”. Imagine that. But, this did lead to some people inquiring as to what I considered to be the, “best” (images of the word “BEST” appears). Problem with the word “best” is that it implies, “good” or, “warrants existing”. (Clips of the multiple Disney Sequels) NCh (VO): At best, some are less awful than others, but after the literally dozens of hours I spent slogging through this mess... NCh: ...I thought I could give you a best list to counteract the worst list but honestly, I don’t think I can. But, I can give you a relatively less awful, list. NCh (VO): In a way, this was a more difficult list to put together. Because while there were a couple that surprised me at how relatively not awful they were, the majority are, well, let’s just say that before Lasseter took over, it was a, dark time. NCh: So this week, we’re going to try to be... less, mean, and give you a... less, awful, list, to, balance, out, the last one so, with that, I give you my top. (The word “TOP” appears in capitals again and will do so for the rest of the words in the title, just like in the previous list, but not as grand.) T... Five. (TEN “Five”) ...L-east Awful. (“LEAST AWFUL”) Disney Sequels. (“DISNEY SEQUELS”) Why only five? ‘cause I, I can’t.