About: Memory Alpha talk:People navigational templates   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Do all these really need to be in-universe? How about Star Trek: The Next Generation Main Characters, and that sort of thing, to be placed in the bginfo sections? --Defiant (talk) 18:10, December 1, 2015 (UTC) "Lead character captains" was another such template I thought of. This would consist of Pike, Kirk, Picard, Sisko, Janeway, Archer, and alternate reality Kirk, in that order. My thinking is these sort of templates might be quite useful to newbies to Star Trek. --Defiant (talk) 18:16, December 1, 2015 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Memory Alpha talk:People navigational templates
rdfs:comment
  • Do all these really need to be in-universe? How about Star Trek: The Next Generation Main Characters, and that sort of thing, to be placed in the bginfo sections? --Defiant (talk) 18:10, December 1, 2015 (UTC) "Lead character captains" was another such template I thought of. This would consist of Pike, Kirk, Picard, Sisko, Janeway, Archer, and alternate reality Kirk, in that order. My thinking is these sort of templates might be quite useful to newbies to Star Trek. --Defiant (talk) 18:16, December 1, 2015 (UTC)
dbkwik:memory-alph...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Do all these really need to be in-universe? How about Star Trek: The Next Generation Main Characters, and that sort of thing, to be placed in the bginfo sections? --Defiant (talk) 18:10, December 1, 2015 (UTC) "Lead character captains" was another such template I thought of. This would consist of Pike, Kirk, Picard, Sisko, Janeway, Archer, and alternate reality Kirk, in that order. My thinking is these sort of templates might be quite useful to newbies to Star Trek. --Defiant (talk) 18:16, December 1, 2015 (UTC) I'll be perfectly honest in stating that I dislike most of the ones based around Starship captains/etc, but that's only me. I think that these could be useful just for main characters on a show (but not the "lead captains" thing). Of course, for TOS, that would be quite limited... And then it would have to be determined what defines a "main character". Haha. Now, they might also be cleaner if they were collapsible too, but I'm not 100% convinced I want to get into that either... -- sulfur (talk) 18:50, December 1, 2015 (UTC) I suspected it's already been decided what constitutes a main character, as we already have a Main characters page. --Defiant (talk) 18:59, December 1, 2015 (UTC) Hrm. True. Even if they don't quite match up with the actual way they're presented in the credits... :) -- sulfur (talk) 19:02, December 1, 2015 (UTC) This sounds like these would just be character based versions of , and more or less duplicate the links in the navigation bar and the regular casts lists found in many places. I suppose there's not much harm in it, though they shouldn't be listed here, these are the in-universe people navs, but recurring characters might be better served by having these. - 05:57, December 3, 2015 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software