About: Wookieepedia:Inq/Zsinj (second review)   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Atlas info specifically on Zsinj: -- Darth Culator (Talk) 01:45, May 16, 2010 (UTC) * The bit in bts about him resembling the Star Trek dude simply says that the image resembles him --- it doesn't say anything about authorial (or illustratorial?) intent, doesn't have a source, and seems like speculative and unneeded info. Anyone mind if I blast it and its accompanying image? Menkooroo 17:20, May 22, 2010 (UTC) * I don't see why. It's only drawing the reader's attention to an apparent similarity, not making a direct conclusion. The visual evidence is sufficient to stand on its own. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 14:02, May 25, 2010 (UTC) * It's a pretty speculative road to go down. If we're going to say that the visual evidence speaks for itself, we're opening up a whole new can of worm

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Wookieepedia:Inq/Zsinj (second review)
rdfs:comment
  • Atlas info specifically on Zsinj: -- Darth Culator (Talk) 01:45, May 16, 2010 (UTC) * The bit in bts about him resembling the Star Trek dude simply says that the image resembles him --- it doesn't say anything about authorial (or illustratorial?) intent, doesn't have a source, and seems like speculative and unneeded info. Anyone mind if I blast it and its accompanying image? Menkooroo 17:20, May 22, 2010 (UTC) * I don't see why. It's only drawing the reader's attention to an apparent similarity, not making a direct conclusion. The visual evidence is sufficient to stand on its own. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 14:02, May 25, 2010 (UTC) * It's a pretty speculative road to go down. If we're going to say that the visual evidence speaks for itself, we're opening up a whole new can of worm
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:starwars/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Atlas info specifically on Zsinj: -- Darth Culator (Talk) 01:45, May 16, 2010 (UTC) * The bit in bts about him resembling the Star Trek dude simply says that the image resembles him --- it doesn't say anything about authorial (or illustratorial?) intent, doesn't have a source, and seems like speculative and unneeded info. Anyone mind if I blast it and its accompanying image? Menkooroo 17:20, May 22, 2010 (UTC) * I don't see why. It's only drawing the reader's attention to an apparent similarity, not making a direct conclusion. The visual evidence is sufficient to stand on its own. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 14:02, May 25, 2010 (UTC) * It's a pretty speculative road to go down. If we're going to say that the visual evidence speaks for itself, we're opening up a whole new can of worms... this image of Jaina Solo looks a lot like the female lead from Law & Order SVU, after all. If there were even the slightest hint to give merit to the speculation, like the illustrator admitting to sometimes basing his characters off of old TV characters or something, then the dot-connecting would have some basis, but as it stands, it's pretty eyebrow-raising. In my opinion, anyway. Menkooroo 14:35, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software