About: WoWWiki talk:Featured article/Archive02   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbkwik.webdatacommons.org associated with source dataset(s)

I think we should have classes in there, just a a bit of help, and races for a bit of lore. I am not very good at making suggestions, but there is my idea. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shigamori (talk • contr). For further discussion of any of the above listed articles, please make a new section! 14:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • WoWWiki talk:Featured article/Archive02
rdfs:comment
  • I think we should have classes in there, just a a bit of help, and races for a bit of lore. I am not very good at making suggestions, but there is my idea. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shigamori (talk • contr). For further discussion of any of the above listed articles, please make a new section! 14:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
dbkwik:wowwiki/pro...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • I think we should have classes in there, just a a bit of help, and races for a bit of lore. I am not very good at making suggestions, but there is my idea. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shigamori (talk • contr). I've looked at your suggestion and have viewed every class and race page separately. Here's my report: The druid article is good The hunter article is badly lined out The mage article is short, and the section weren't done good enough Paladin, I dislike that black table, and an article with a cleanup template can not become featured until its prose is reworked Priest; this article has a redundant quest section, and it doesn't have external links Rogue, also no no external links section, and the title isn't bold Shaman, *gasp* no pictures of totems?, also, the section headers were poorly done Warlock, the section 'Macros' needs to go, and an external links section needs to be created Warrior, too short Human, nice Dwarf, rather short Night elf, nice Gnome, the big quote is unprofessional, and the section names aren't logical Draenei, section "Controversy, confusion, and retcons" has gotta go Orc, no WoW screenshots Undead, "Opinion and analysis" should be removed Tauren, nice Troll, nice Blood elf, get rid of "Dark Destiny" and "Controversy" I hope that helps. Image:IconSmall BloodElf Male.gifAPΘLLΘ(ZEUS) 04:36, 9 April 2007 (EDT) I'll look at those and try to make them good enough to feature Shigamori (talk • contr) The info from dark destiny section of blood elves simply needs to be merged somewhere else in the article, not elimited entirely. It is a valid piece of information.Baggins 16:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC) For further discussion of any of the above listed articles, please make a new section! 14:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software