About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Make Money Fast (2nd opinion)

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Make Money Fast (2nd opinion) Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbkwik.webdatacommons.org associated with source dataset(s)

It sorta failed VFH so I need a second opinon, Anyone? --19:32, Apr 25 2008 (UTC)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Make Money Fast (2nd opinion)
rdfs:comment	It sorta failed VFH so I need a second opinon, Anyone? --19:32, Apr 25 2008 (UTC)
dcterms:subject	Pee Review
Mcomment	Was going to be an average, but I raised it to help your self-esteem. Although telling you that probably didn't help.
Pcomment	Definitely one of the worst encyclopedia articles I've ever read. What? It wasn't intended to be an encyclopedia entry? Then why is it here; it's just SPAM, and maybe only just barely satire on SPAM, but I'm sure that there is something on this site that accomplishes the satirical aspect better than this. I'm also not a big fan of the censor and strikeouts everywhere; using them in an article is one thing, overusing them in an article is another thing, but overusing them in spam is another "another thing."
Icomment	Other than the SPAM KING himself, the images were nothing really special. I do have to admit that the certificate actually looked pretty good on my 'puter, and I think I'm going to get it printed off to hang on the wall, since it does already have my name on it.
Pscore	3(xsd:integer)
Ccomment	4.0
Cscore	2(xsd:integer)
Mscore	5(xsd:integer)
Hcomment	I didn't really ever laugh out loud at this, and the only time I came close was when the article contradicted itself. "It could be your name on this certificate", but the certificate clearly uses the almost-getting-overused-and-cliched- template. Hey! My name IS on the certificate, article! And Richie McRich? Sounds a little too Casper the Friendly Ghost to me.
Iscore	6(xsd:integer)
Hscore	5(xsd:double)
Fcomment	I don't think this should be candidate for VFH in its current state, especially if it's already failed once. If it were to be written as a more encyclopedic article, then maybe just MAYBE it has a chance.
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/x9QubJQ7MoIc6tQbgjPU9g== dbkwik:resource/yFN67gnsWPKFr390CT1mxA==
Signature	--04-28
abstract	It sorta failed VFH so I need a second opinon, Anyone? --19:32, Apr 25 2008 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software