About: Edwards v. Aguillard   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

In Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Louisiana's "Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science in Public School Instruction" Act, La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 17:286.1-17:286.7 (West 1982), before it ever went into effect. The 7-2 Court declared it to be facially invalid as violative of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Justice William Brennan wrote the decision and was joined by the liberal wing of the court. Justice Antonin Scalia and Chief Justice William Rehnquist dissented. * Full text of all opinions

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Edwards v. Aguillard
rdfs:comment
  • In Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Louisiana's "Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science in Public School Instruction" Act, La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 17:286.1-17:286.7 (West 1982), before it ever went into effect. The 7-2 Court declared it to be facially invalid as violative of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Justice William Brennan wrote the decision and was joined by the liberal wing of the court. Justice Antonin Scalia and Chief Justice William Rehnquist dissented. * Full text of all opinions
  • Edwards v. Aguillard, US Supreme Court - 482 578 1987 was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court ruled that a Louisiana law requiring that creation science be taught in public schools whenever evolution was taught was unconstitutional, because the law was specifically intended to advance a particular religion. At the same time, however, it held that "teaching a variety of scientific theories about the origins of humankind to school children might be validly done with the clear secular intent of enhancing the effectiveness of science instruction."
sameAs
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:christianit...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Edwards v. Aguillard, US Supreme Court - 482 578 1987 was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court ruled that a Louisiana law requiring that creation science be taught in public schools whenever evolution was taught was unconstitutional, because the law was specifically intended to advance a particular religion. At the same time, however, it held that "teaching a variety of scientific theories about the origins of humankind to school children might be validly done with the clear secular intent of enhancing the effectiveness of science instruction." In support of Aguillard, 72 Nobel prize-winning scientists, 17 state academies of science, and 7 other scientific organizations filed an amicus brief which described creation science as being composed of religious tenets.
  • In Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Louisiana's "Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science in Public School Instruction" Act, La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 17:286.1-17:286.7 (West 1982), before it ever went into effect. The 7-2 Court declared it to be facially invalid as violative of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The Louisiana law forbade the teaching of the theory of evolution in public schools unless accompanied by instruction in "creation science." § 17:286.4A. No school is required to teach evolution or creation science. If either is taught, however, the other must also be taught. Ibid. The theories of evolution and creation science are statutorily defined as "the scientific evidences for [creation or evolution] and inferences from those scientific evidences." §§ 17.286.3(2) and (3). Justice William Brennan wrote the decision and was joined by the liberal wing of the court. Justice Antonin Scalia and Chief Justice William Rehnquist dissented. Justice Byron White wrote a separate concurrence, implying that the outcome was necessitated by prior court rulings with which he may disagree. "Unless, therefore, we are to reconsider the Court's decisions interpreting the Establishment Clause, I agree that the judgment of the Court of Appeals must be affirmed." * Full text of all opinions
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software