| Property | Value |
|---|
| rdfs:label | - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Battle of the Alamo
|
| rdfs:comment | - This is a strange thing to ask, but could you also make sure it's at least somewhat historically accurate (minus the jokes made for humor)? Having a blatant error that wasn't done for humor, at least for me, is a detriment to the overall experience. Do you agree? If you don't care for historical accuracy, then it's fine by me. This isn't Wikipedia, so my request is extremely idiotic, but I wanted to make an article that poked fun on history, so If I get some history wrong, then...nevermind, I should stop blabbering.-- 07:41, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
|
| dcterms:subject | |
| Mcomment | - Overal, it's good quality. Just work on your humor skills, though.
|
| Pcomment | - Very impressive. In fact, for a first-timmer like you, your prose and formatting is better than others.
|
| Icomment | - Same thing like hummor. How about you search RadicalX's Corner for some more slap-your-knee funnier ones. My advice for the Alamo building is to add a drunken guy wanking his small penis; or a picture of Santa Anna, but with a face in combination of Barack Obama, Hitler, and Lucifer mix together. And along with that, add a caption saying, Shield your eyes kids! This anal-minded dictator will make you take off your pants and give you a blowjob! Or any other job because molests kids!. But that's just me, and you should not copy my advice, but tweek it a little bit to make it your own original punchline.
|
| Pscore | |
| Ccomment | - Concept is good. You've seem to have placed it all out, so I'll give you a 7.
|
| Cscore | |
| Mscore | |
| Hcomment | - First of off when I first gave a glance at this article, that it had absolutely no hummor at all! I can understand that you are most definately a n00bie, and also propably a former Wikipedian writer. Here are some examples of making some hummor, in which I want you to not copy, but also get the whole picture of what I'm saying.
INSTEAD OF: since Texans had to use friendship in working together while fighting Indian Raiding parties
TRY CHANGING IT LIKE: Since Texans had to use the gay little tree-hugging style of friendship in working together while fighting those noisy-ass Indian Titty-Raiding parties; where the Indians both drink 8 bottles of illegally-made liquir, and then trying to get some milk from those crazy but horny gyspies' big, beautiful breasts.
INSTEAD OF: there was a large influx of immigrants from America, many seeking a new life and an escape from hard times in the wild frontier
TRY CHANGING IT LIKE: There were large influxes of fat, rasist motherfuckers from America; many seeking new life and escape from those pesky IRS hounds trying to dig they're hourly $5 MILLION in income tax... up the residents' asses.
INSTEAD OF: which they showed by bringing thousands of enslaved Africans with them
TRY CHANGING IT LIKE: Which they brought a bunch of pnemonia-ridden, goofy-looking niggas Africans that looked worse than Amy Whinehouse.
INSTEAD OF: Santa Anna, the massive killjoy he was, sought it fit to remove the rights of Texians , such as the right to freedom of speech and freedom of religion, and to increase taxes.
TRY CHANGING IT LIKE: Santa Anna, the great big dickweed he was, because he was molested by his father in his childhood; sought to oppress the bloody-hell out of Texians from all of their freedom, mostly so no one would fun at him because he was raped consistantly in the past. Did I mention that he's an ass-jabber?
See, like that. If I were you, I'd look at this article, Avant Garde Jazz, along with some hummorous featured articles. Oh... and be sure to add some hummor to even the ones that I didn't point out.
|
| Iscore | |
| Hscore | |
| Fcomment | - Well, that's the advice that I'm going to give you. Be sure to heed them, and your article will be a legened like all of the other featured articles.
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedia/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
| Signature | |
| abstract | - This is a strange thing to ask, but could you also make sure it's at least somewhat historically accurate (minus the jokes made for humor)? Having a blatant error that wasn't done for humor, at least for me, is a detriment to the overall experience. Do you agree? If you don't care for historical accuracy, then it's fine by me. This isn't Wikipedia, so my request is extremely idiotic, but I wanted to make an article that poked fun on history, so If I get some history wrong, then...nevermind, I should stop blabbering.-- 07:41, June 9, 2011 (UTC) Well, here's my first review for this article, as I'm now going to analyze this article. --Lucyfer & his friend, Wlado! 00:15, June 15, 2011 (UTC) Dante once said that people who provide false counsel get eternity on the Eighth Circle. I see bright, fiery things in your future. -- 00:19, June 15, 2011 (UTC) What I took from this is he wants more hummers in your article. 07:00, 20 June 2011
|
