PropertyValue
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • United States v. Lee
rdfs:comment
  • United States v. Lee, , is a 5-to-4 ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Constitution's prohibition on lawsuits against the federal government did not extend to officers of the government themselves. The case involved the heir of Mary Anna Custis Lee, wife of Confederate States of America General Robert E. Lee, who sued to regain control of Arlington House and its grounds. Arlington had been seized by the United States government in 1861 and eventually converted into Arlington National Cemetery. The estate had been sold to pay outstanding taxes, but the lawsuit contested the tax sale as improper. A jury found in favor of the Lees. The Supreme Court, too, concluded that the tax sale was illegal. In stripping the federal officers of their sovereign immunity, the Supr
owl:sameAs
JoinMajority
  • Field, Harlan, Matthews, Blatchford
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:military/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
USVol
  • 106
Dissent
  • Gray
Majority
  • Miller
LawsApplied
  • Act for the Collection of Taxes in the Insurrectionary Districts ; Fifth Amendment
DecideYear
  • 1882
Litigants
  • United States v. Lee
Citation
  • 1
ArgueDateB
  • 19
ArgueDateA
  • --10-18
Prior
  • Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia.
ArgueYear
  • 1882
SCOTUS
  • 1882
Holding
  • Sovereign immunity does not extend to officers of the government.
JoinDissent
  • Waite, Bradley, Woods
Fullname
  • United States v. Lee; Kaufman v. Lee
DecideDate
  • --12-04
USPage
  • 196
abstract
  • United States v. Lee, , is a 5-to-4 ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Constitution's prohibition on lawsuits against the federal government did not extend to officers of the government themselves. The case involved the heir of Mary Anna Custis Lee, wife of Confederate States of America General Robert E. Lee, who sued to regain control of Arlington House and its grounds. Arlington had been seized by the United States government in 1861 and eventually converted into Arlington National Cemetery. The estate had been sold to pay outstanding taxes, but the lawsuit contested the tax sale as improper. A jury found in favor of the Lees. The Supreme Court, too, concluded that the tax sale was illegal. In stripping the federal officers of their sovereign immunity, the Supreme Court agreed that suit against them was proper. The jury verdict returned Arlington to the Lee family, but only temporarily. The family never returned to Arlington, but rather sold the estate to the United States government in 1883 for $150,000.