PropertyValue
rdfs:label
  • Articles for deletion/Sunbelt books
rdfs:comment
  • Non-notable publishing house. No independent coverage to be found. Some of the books they have published have won some minor awards, but none sufficient to even raise the titles to notability according to WP:NB. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
dbkwik:speedydeletion/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Non-notable publishing house. No independent coverage to be found. Some of the books they have published have won some minor awards, but none sufficient to even raise the titles to notability according to WP:NB. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC) * Weak keep, but cut down, clean up, and rename to Sunbelt Publications. The current version of the article is bloated and promotional in tone (and I note that a prior article about Sunbelt Publications was speedied in 2007 because of its advert content), but buried in the dross there appears to be a legitimately notable small publisher. The article already contains a few legitmate sources, and a GNews search [1] shows a number of articles about the company (such as this [2]), and a large number of articles with substantial coverage of books they publish. If the promotional stuff can be deleted and the basic facts kept, then the encyclopedia will be better for keeping this information about what appears to be a reasonably prolific local publisher. --Arxiloxos (talk) 02:44, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)