| Property | Value |
|---|
| rdfs:label | - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Rock Beats Paper?
|
| rdfs:comment | - Hurrah, my first Why article! This is the point where I'm told I got it all wrong and am forced to do it again. Bear in mind I did the pictures myself, so don't complain, and also that I couldn't think of many jokes to stick in. So off you go, little Pee Reviewer, and lets see how little this article scores! (PS: I'm only being negative for fun. Please don't blam this article badly!} Garionepsilon 13:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
|
| dcterms:subject | |
| Mcomment | - Did you know there's a strategy guide of Rock Paper Scissors? They say the issue is temporal in nature, and as paper is representative of trees, the roots of trees will cover, penetrate, and even crush rocks, given time. And don't even get me started on the "but what if a boulder breaks the tree in half?" bit.
|
| Pcomment | - Fits the absurdity fairly well to use the simple diagrams and ridiculous situational bits. As for formatting, perhaps add in more links. They only have to vaguely make sense, too. For example, "Pamela Anderson is known for her beautiful complexion". I use that sort of trick often. No, not everything links to the article on boobs.
|
| Icomment | - Not exactly the prettiest of images, but they get the message across simply enough. The lines and such could probably be made a bit more uniform, and the Negative Zone bit could look more elegant. If all else fails, ask someone at the Potatochopper desk for assistance.
|
| Pscore | |
| Ccomment | - Meh. Lots of people have asked this question before. Admittedly, satirizing it as you have done is a good choice. If you were to take this into strange new directions that might work well.
|
| Cscore | |
| Mscore | |
| Hcomment | - Carries a fair bit of absurdity to it, if you're a fan of Rock Paper Scissors, and even if you're not, you'll pick up on it pretty swiftly.
|
| Iscore | |
| Hscore | |
| Fcomment | - It's not something that'll make it to FA as is, but it's still good for a chuckle.
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedia/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
| Signature | |
| abstract | - Hurrah, my first Why article! This is the point where I'm told I got it all wrong and am forced to do it again. Bear in mind I did the pictures myself, so don't complain, and also that I couldn't think of many jokes to stick in. So off you go, little Pee Reviewer, and lets see how little this article scores! (PS: I'm only being negative for fun. Please don't blam this article badly!} Garionepsilon 13:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
|
