PropertyValue
rdfs:label
  • Proving evolution
rdfs:comment
  • Proving Evolution Bones * The discovery of Mrs. Leakey makes the chart of Evolution obsolete. -TIME, November 10, 1975, p. 93 * They say about the discovery, that all we do is simply move man back 3 million years because they simply overlap in time. Well, 3 million year period almost wipes out 2/3 of the evolution chart… How could man evolve from Australopithecus…if man was already 1million years before them. - See Bones of Contention by Marvin Lubenow. - See Bones of Contention by Martin Lubenov. 1992. www,drdino.com -See Science (1984), Vol. 224, pp. 58-61. -See Creation Seminar#3 Truth
dbkwik:speedydeletion/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
concern
  • Original research
Timestamp
  • 20120719114717
abstract
  • Proving Evolution Bones * The discovery of Mrs. Leakey makes the chart of Evolution obsolete. -TIME, November 10, 1975, p. 93 * They say about the discovery, that all we do is simply move man back 3 million years because they simply overlap in time. Well, 3 million year period almost wipes out 2/3 of the evolution chart… How could man evolve from Australopithecus…if man was already 1million years before them. - See Bones of Contention by Marvin Lubenow. * Peking Man: the bones are missing? Truth: The Peking bones were well guarded in China by their finders. Two French scientists were permitted to study them and discovered that they were animal bones… then the bones “mysteriously” disappeared during WWII. - See Bones of Contention by Martin Lubenov. 1992. www,drdino.com * Other questionable species, such as the Piltdown Man were built up from the jawbone of a modern ape and fossilized human skull. - See Bone Peddlers: Selling Evolution by William R. Fix (New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1984). * Another questionable species-the Hesperopithecus was a horrible blunder. This “man” was built up from one tooth of an extinct pig. * Even the Neanderthal man disproved that man evolved from apes because their brains were 13% larger than the average modern man. But no reputable scientist thinks it’s a missing link. - See Buried Alive The Startling Truth about Neanderthal Man (1998) by Dr. Jack Couzzo. * Why use “Lucy” to prove evolution? Their Fossils show they had long forearms and short legs, curved fingers and toes for swinging, and were only three feet tall! Lucy’s an ape, not a missing link. -See Fossils Teeth & Sex New Perspectives on Human Evolution, by Dr. Charles Oxnard (1997), p.227. * Do you know why the Leiden Museum and the American Museum of Natural History have removed their displays? Because “Homo erectus” was made up from the skullcap of a gibbon and a human thogh bone. -See bones of Contention by Martin Lubenow, p. 86 and Creation Seminar #3 by Dr, Kent Hovind. Dating * The dating techniques are off! If you think that Mrs. Leakey’s Find shoots down the Bible, which places Adam and Eve around 10,000 years or less. How could you question the reliability of Carbon-14, Potassium-Argon , the Uranium Lead method, or other radiometric methods? Shells from living snails were carbon dated as being 27,000 years old! They were still alive! -See Science (1984), Vol. 224, pp. 58-61. * Lava from Mt. St. Helens was dated by the Potassium-Argon method, and it ranged from 340,000 to 3 million years old! It erupted in 1980! -See Dr. S.A. Austin, CEN Tech. Journal (1996), Vol. 10, No.3, pp. 335-343. * The rocks taken from the moon have been dated by various radiometric techniques. They didn’t all gave the same date! It varied from 700 million years to 28 billion years! It’s all a guesswork! But they’ve brainwashed the public into believing that they have all the answers! -For other faulty dating, see Kent Hovind’s Creation Seminar#1 Dinosaurs *If you think that it’s a scientific fact that dinosaurs died off 70 million years ago, to say that man lived at the time of dinosaurs would be totally unscientic?!? Think Again! There’s plenty of evidence of dinosaurs and man living together! It’s been found in Russia, Turkmenistan, Peru, Brazil, Mexico, and the USA. -See Creation Research Society Quarterly 9/89 , pp. 41-48, 12/89, pp. 77-98, and Noah to Abraham by Eric von Fange (1994), pp. 36-37 * There’s amazing evidence that a few small dinosaurs are still alive. A creature was washed up on the beach near the Salinas, California in 1925 and was identified as a plesiosaur. -See Skin Diver Magazine, Nov. 1989 and Shipwrecks and sea Monsters of California’s Central Coast by Randall Reinstedt, p. 166 * Dinosaur-like creatures have been reported in several parts of the world . -See Creation Seminar#3 Truth * The Earth is only 6,000 years old. Although according to the Evolutionary Uniformitarian Geologists that the earth is almost 5 billion years old. -See Columbian Encyclopedia, 6th edition (2001), or any modern encyclopedia. * Erosion, like rain, rivers, to wash away everything above sea level would not take billions of years. Only 14 million years. If Earth were 1 billion years old, our continents would have eroded away some 70 times. -The total amount of sediment flowing into the ocean is 27.5 billion tons every year. There are 30.4 million cubic miles of continental crust above sea level having a mass of 383 billion tons. -See The Young Earth by John D. Morris, Ph.D (1994) p.89 * The population growth shows us that man has only been here a few thousand years. The oldest coral reef, the Largest desert, the oldest living tree are each only a few thousand years old. -See Creation Seminar#1 for dozens of ways to show the earth is not “billions of years old” * The only one who really knows the universe is the one who created it. The Bible calls Him Jesus. Col. 1:16 * If you’re having second thoughts in believing this research because of the similarities of apes and human, etc…. it is because only one created all things…God is. * Darwin’s Confession There was suppose to have been a testimonial of Charles Darwin disclaiming the "scientific proof" of his theory of evolution. Many have claimed that Darwin recanted late in life, on his death bed. The story of Darwin's rebuttal did not start until about one generation later. His former nurse, Lady Hope, was able to join the lecture circuit with this claim, but without tangible evidence either way. Whether Darwin ended up believing in the theory of evolution or not, the damage has been done in his name. And ... if he did recant, on his death bed, they say, then he did not actually make any efforts to make his confession public. "In the Minds of Men" discusses this in chapter 5: (Look for "Lady Hope.") Karl Marx was contemporary of Charles Darwin. Darwin's work was foundational for Marxism, as it claimed to have provided a means for explaining human existence without needing the Bible and its Creation. Marx read On the Origin of the Species twice in one year, shortly after its publication. Karl Marx had become an avowed atheist and Darwin's theory aided in the implementation of Marxism a couple of generations later with its (belief in "no rules" as a "liberator") mass murder by the millions. (No dusty old religious books to tell them that murder was wrong or other inhibitors!) An atheistic dictator was not bound by any rules regarding the treatment of his own people. Lady Hope (was that her real name?) had motive to potentially invent the story. It made her very popular among believers, and thus provided an income for later in her life. And recall that the story did not start to be spread until a couple of decades after his death. Charles Darwin's Deathbed Confession About Evolution I have proved that Evolution is not true…