| Property | Value |
|---|
| rdfs:label | - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/My Mother the Car
|
| rdfs:comment | - An article about an actual TV show from the '60s. It's main problem is that it's kinda disorganized and boring in places. If you could help me with that, that'd be great. Thanks! I definitely agree with what you're saying. This was one of my hardest articles to write that didn't fail automatically. I'm going to have to think about how to do this...
|
| dcterms:subject | |
| Mcomment | |
| Pcomment | - The writing here, as is usual for someone who won WotM, is very good, no spelling errors, very good grammar and whatnot. Things like italics and emboldening are used well, as are most of the templates . Two things are holdong you back here - the lack of a major blurb at the top of an article giving basic information and the fact that the top infobox, in my opinion, needs some kind of background or table - the text feels loose, not attached to the actual box. Other than that, very good here.
|
| Icomment | - The images here are all fantastic, in my opinion. If it wasn't that I think 10 should always mean absolutely perfect, I would be considering giving you one here. All of the images are well thought through, relative to the article, funny, and have almost perfect, linking captions. The only thing I'll say here is you need to capitalise "It" in the last image caption.
|
| Pscore | |
| Ccomment | - The concept here is the main problem why this isn't brilliant. The way you've gone about this is parodying how obvious the jokes are in My Mother the Car, and the way that this kind of humour has to be written makes it rather abrasive to read, making it normally wear thin very easily. However, with your writing you've managed to keep it alive much longer than most, and due to that I feel you've gotten pretty close to the maximum potential allowed by this concept.
|
| Cscore | |
| Hcomment | |
| Iscore | |
| Hscore | - (8+6.5+9.5+7.5+8.3)/5 round1
|
| Fcomment | - I'm not sure if this would pass VFH – the abrasive, quick hitting nature of the article would garner a few againsts I would think – but it's more than funny enough. It just needs tidying up around the edges methinks, and possibly inserting a few more lines. I definitely enjoyed reviewing this, very good article.
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedia/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
| Signature | - Heerenveen/sig3 (6/04 11:33)
|
| abstract | - An article about an actual TV show from the '60s. It's main problem is that it's kinda disorganized and boring in places. If you could help me with that, that'd be great. Thanks! I definitely agree with what you're saying. This was one of my hardest articles to write that didn't fail automatically. I'm going to have to think about how to do this...
|
