| Property | Value |
|---|
| rdfs:label | |
| rdfs:comment | - The glyph can be separated into four sections, Luna (moon), Sol (sun), Elementa (elements), and Ignis (fire). All text in this section is quoted directly from Dee's book.
- The Monas Hieroglyphica (or Hieroglyphic Monad) is an esoteric symbol invented and designed by John Dee, the Elizabethan Magus and Court Astrologer of Elizabeth I of England. It is also the title of the 1564 book in which Dee expounds the meaning of his symbol. Image:DeeHieroglyph.gif
|
| owl:sameAs | |
| dcterms:subject | |
| dbkwik:uncharted/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
| abstract | - The glyph can be separated into four sections, Luna (moon), Sol (sun), Elementa (elements), and Ignis (fire). All text in this section is quoted directly from Dee's book.
- The Monas Hieroglyphica (or Hieroglyphic Monad) is an esoteric symbol invented and designed by John Dee, the Elizabethan Magus and Court Astrologer of Elizabeth I of England. It is also the title of the 1564 book in which Dee expounds the meaning of his symbol. Image:DeeHieroglyph.gif The Hieroglyphic embodies Dee's vision of the unity of the Cosmos and is a composite of various esoteric and astrological symbols. Dee wrote a commentary on it which serves as a primer of its mysteries. However, the obscurity of the commentary is such that it is believed that Dee used it as a sort of textbook for a more detailed explanation of the Hieroglyph which he would give in person. In the absence of any remaining detail of this explanation we may never know the full significance of the Glyph. The existence of the Hieroglyph links Dee to Rosicrucianism but in what way remains obscure. On the title page of the Rosicrucian Manifesto The Chymical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz, the Hieroglyph appears beside the text of the invitation to the Royal Wedding given to Rosenkreutz who narrates the work. It is indeed at least possible that Dee showed the Glyph to Johannes Valentinus Andreae or even an associate during one of his visits to Central Europe. However, whether Andrae's claims of authoring the treatise hold any weight is still a hotly debated question among scholars.
|
