| Property | Value |
|---|
| rdfs:label | - Wackypedia:Review/Old Man River
|
| rdfs:comment | - Well, it's a short article, yes, and really doesn't deserve a review, but I'd like to see how I'm going with these kind of articles, or if I should abandon this style for another. (On an unrealated note, for some reason I'm listening to Old Man River now.) KGT 23:47, 23 Aym 2008 (UTC) Well, that's good, I didn't really want it to be too amazing. Also, style, meaning the length, subject, randomness etc. The reason I wanted this reviewed is basically to see how good it is in terms of a normal (average/short length) article, just to clarify. --KGT 08:59, 2 Yoon 2008 (UTC)
|
| dcterms:subject | |
| Mcomment | |
| Icomment | |
| Ccomment | - Not really an amazing concept
|
| Cscore | |
| Mscore | |
| Iscore | |
| Fcomment | |
| dbkwik:wackypedia/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
| Signature | - {{:User:testostereich/sig
|
| Lcomment | - not an amzing article, kinda randumb page filler. What did you mean by the style ytou're using may I ask?
|
| Ecomment | - Didn't really have any substance to it, randome though
|
| Escore | |
| Fscore | |
| abstract | - Well, it's a short article, yes, and really doesn't deserve a review, but I'd like to see how I'm going with these kind of articles, or if I should abandon this style for another. (On an unrealated note, for some reason I'm listening to Old Man River now.) KGT 23:47, 23 Aym 2008 (UTC) Well, that's good, I didn't really want it to be too amazing. Also, style, meaning the length, subject, randomness etc. The reason I wanted this reviewed is basically to see how good it is in terms of a normal (average/short length) article, just to clarify. --KGT 08:59, 2 Yoon 2008 (UTC)
|
