| rdfs:comment | - [[File:Boatman.PNG]] I personaly think some pics look better when not transparent. In some pics of small objects like this picture I think you need the surroundings to see that this is infact a boatman and not some green splot. Ether that or we need a much bigger immage of him standing upright? Am I the only one? 20:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC) No, I was just stating that we still need to add transparency to images, and that the main images should be, in my opinion, a chat head and body-shot. If more images are needed, a gallery can be created at the bottom of the page. Karlis (talk) (contribs)
|
| abstract | - [[File:Boatman.PNG]] I personaly think some pics look better when not transparent. In some pics of small objects like this picture I think you need the surroundings to see that this is infact a boatman and not some green splot. Ether that or we need a much bigger immage of him standing upright? Am I the only one? 20:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC) I totally agree- in fact I was just looking at this picture earlier today and thinking the same thing. the fact that this picture shows the boat and water in the background adds a lot to the picture. File:Rollback crown.svgAburnett001 {Talk} {#} 20:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Images of NPC's and items should be transparent as the article is about the NPC or item, not the scenery around them. Personally, I believe each article should have a chat-head image and an image of the NPC as players would see them to better identify them. Items can have an inventory image as well as the enhanced detail or equipped image. But I believe almost all images need transparency to keep a sense of consistency throughout the encyclopedia. For this reason, I disagree. Karlis (talk) (contribs) 20:38, 27 September 2008 (UTC) True, i see your point, maybe then this image should be placed elsewhere on the page as a sort of "supplementary image" and have a larger transparent picture detailing the actual figure in the NPC box, along with a chat-head detail. File:Rollback crown.svgAburnett001 {Talk} {#} 20:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Most of the time I look up NPC or an item to find them so that pic would help me find the boat man by some crates this is why I vow to add a map for each NPC 20:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC) I believe that a chat head and a full-body image of the NPC would suffice. Karlis (talk) (contribs) 20:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Do you mean to say I shouldn't add maps? Am I allowed to add them? 20:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC) No, I was just stating that we still need to add transparency to images, and that the main images should be, in my opinion, a chat head and body-shot. If more images are needed, a gallery can be created at the bottom of the page. Karlis (talk) (contribs) 21:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
|
