PropertyValue
rdfs:label
  • Tarzan and Jane
rdfs:comment
  • (The Disneycember logo is shown, before showing clips from Tarzan and Jane) Doug (vo): So what would you like to see? A sequel to Disney's Tarzan, one of the biggest summer hits when it came out, or just three episodes of a cartoon pilot series strung together and saying, "That makes it a movie"? Well, you got the goddamn latter. Give Tarzan and Jane credit that it's not called Tarzan II. No, no. We get that later. (We see the DVD cover for that movie) It's at least not pretending that this is supposed to be a flowing, cinematic follow-up. But, with that said, why even watch it? This is another anthology of stories that aren't really interesting, are usually pointless, doesn't have the same animation, doesn't have the same voice actors. They couldn't even get Phil Collins back. They just r
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:thatguywiththeglasses/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • (The Disneycember logo is shown, before showing clips from Tarzan and Jane) Doug (vo): So what would you like to see? A sequel to Disney's Tarzan, one of the biggest summer hits when it came out, or just three episodes of a cartoon pilot series strung together and saying, "That makes it a movie"? Well, you got the goddamn latter. Give Tarzan and Jane credit that it's not called Tarzan II. No, no. We get that later. (We see the DVD cover for that movie) It's at least not pretending that this is supposed to be a flowing, cinematic follow-up. But, with that said, why even watch it? This is another anthology of stories that aren't really interesting, are usually pointless, doesn't have the same animation, doesn't have the same voice actors. They couldn't even get Phil Collins back. They just replay one of his songs in the opening and then have a completely different artist at the end sing them out. Are the stories tied together? Well, about as well as Cinderella II ties them together.