| Property | Value |
|---|
| rdfs:label | - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:YesTimeToEdit/A Day In The Life of A Redirect
|
| rdfs:comment | - Well Orian's promised to do this review for me, which I'm grateful for - cause this is a very long article. Personally I think it's quite messy at the moment and maybe lacking in the images department. However I quite like the idea - so I'm looking for quite a detailed review to clean this one up. Thanks in advance! - [17:14 5 July] Have actually started reading it now (pretty good so far!) could you check my last review? 08:05 7 July 2008
|
| dcterms:subject | |
| Mcomment | - As always averaged. Also, you know what a hilarious non-sequitor would be? Linking to Insomnia.
|
| Pcomment | |
| Icomment | - considering the topic you did very well to get so many! I think it might be shy of one or two but personally I’m happy with it as it is.
Just take a closer look at them:
The first one I think you should crop so that it only has the important bit there. As it is there is a whole lot of nothing on 90% of it. It also has your name in it which I’m going to call vanity out of shear pedantic-ness.
The second one Actually wasn’t too bad, bit of a non-sequiter, but was a clever way of getting a picture in the article.
The third one I didn’t get. I guess the caption is Parsi being ironic, but I still don’t get the picture. Who is it of?
The fourth one Seemed a little out of place. And I do mean just a little, move it up one section so it’s by the text that it relates too. By it’s self it’s almost hilarious simply because of that house sized supercomputer he’s holding.
The fifth one is OK I guess. The thing is the person in it is displaying the emotion “Impossibly, Childishly Exited.” As apposed to shocked or disgusted. I’m guessing that’s what you were aiming for
The sixth one is probably the least funny, simply because it’s Paris Hilton and she’s a tired joke, but I’ll let it slide as she is related to this article.
Yeah as for other image suggestions, I’m sorry but I’m a little stuck. Maybe throw out some totally random non-sequitor for the “gay porn talk page pic”
|
| Pscore | |
| Ccomment | - I actually was sceptical reading by title alone but after reading it through I see what you did. You had this depressed soliloquy of quite possibly the most boring and insignificant thing ever, and it worked brilliantly.
One concern I have and I suppose it’s fairly minor is that should I noob happen across this s/he may not “get it” due to the fact that redirects are designed to go unnoticed and your liberal use of other site-related stuff like VFH and things. Probably doesn’t matter too much there is plenty of other stuff in there that’s funny anyway.
Tell me are you going to make this an UnBook? As it will fit nicely on the UnJournal shelf I have.
|
| Cscore | |
| Mscore | |
| Hcomment | |
| Iscore | |
| Hscore | |
| Fcomment | - Not actually the recurrence of the Melty Blood nightmare it may superficially look like, primarily because this was fun to read and thoroughly enjoyable for the whole family. As always if you wanna thank/ask/insult me about anything please visit my talk page.
Facetious comments:
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedia/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
| Signature | |
| abstract | - Well Orian's promised to do this review for me, which I'm grateful for - cause this is a very long article. Personally I think it's quite messy at the moment and maybe lacking in the images department. However I quite like the idea - so I'm looking for quite a detailed review to clean this one up. Thanks in advance! - [17:14 5 July] Have actually started reading it now (pretty good so far!) could you check my last review? 08:05 7 July 2008 Check your last review...what? - [08:07 7 July] The List... check If it's "In Depth or not" I'm kinda worried it may be too short. 08:14 7 July 2008 Hmmm...for me that doesn't quite cut it, but I'll go check with UU or someone to see what they think, as I'm new to list checking. - [08:22 7 July]
|
