| Property | Value |
|---|
| rdfs:label | - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:Hot Japanese Girls - Colourblind or Unable to Speak English? (quick)
|
| rdfs:comment | - So I decided to spend my afternoon rewriting this in several areas. I was quite satisfied with the first review by UU and was I quite tempted by the mention of VFH. The largest problem appeared to be the consistency and tone of the prose, as well as the flow. I had another crack at the article, adding another image in the process. I transformed the instances within the text that seemed to make the 'British Gentleman' character rather irrelevant.
|
| dcterms:subject | |
| Mcomment | - Because I still have no idea what this section means but averages at 10
|
| Pcomment | - Well written, all good so far.
|
| Icomment | - I especially like the one with the cowboy, genius.
|
| Pscore | |
| Ccomment | - The concept is very good, I wasn't expecting it at all.
|
| Cscore | |
| Mscore | |
| Hcomment | - Haha, This is a very funny article, I recommend this for VFH.
|
| Iscore | |
| Hscore | |
| Fcomment | - I recommend this for VFH.
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedia/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
| Signature | |
| abstract | - So I decided to spend my afternoon rewriting this in several areas. I was quite satisfied with the first review by UU and was I quite tempted by the mention of VFH. The largest problem appeared to be the consistency and tone of the prose, as well as the flow. I had another crack at the article, adding another image in the process. I transformed the instances within the text that seemed to make the 'British Gentleman' character rather irrelevant. Anyway, the reason I want a quick review is because I wish to see if this article is in the path of VFH nomination, though suggestions can't hurt. -- 17:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Looks like I got the best score in the world then. -- 17:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Theres nothing wrong with the article and I like it, I've seen worse featured.--Projectmayhem666 Talk 18:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the review, the score was a tad generous though. :) -- 18:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
|
