PropertyValue
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Royal Pointless Military Things Tournament
rdfs:comment
  • Hello, another re-write (no, I don't know if I'll ever actually start an article of my own, leave me alone!) Anyways, I have a suspicion that this could go a lot further, but I wanted to avoid falling into the trap of a long list of pointless military things (which would be so easy to produce). Any suggestions? Or is it OK as it is? -- 12:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
Mcomment
  • marching in a cube...hehehe
Pcomment
  • as anyone who's ever had an article reviewed by me knows, i love links. a lot. maybe sprinkle some more in.
Icomment
  • the two are good, but given the length i think one more would be appropriate. i offer an image i made a while ago that might fit in nicely.
Pscore
  • 7.500000
Ccomment
  • an excellent concept for an uncyc article
Cscore
  • 8
Mscore
  • 8
Hcomment
  • after reading the title, i deemed this article to have huge lame potential, but it provided me with chuckle after chuckle
Iscore
  • 6.500000
Hscore
  • 8
Fcomment
  • your fears were unfounded, sir. i find your list to be funny rather than annoying, as it is relatively short and quite good. it currently stands as a solid rewrite. should you ever feel the need to expand it, maybe sections on specifics could be added, like most pointless technology or best military use of sea otter.
dbkwik:uncyclopedia/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
Signature
  • --10-01
abstract
  • Hello, another re-write (no, I don't know if I'll ever actually start an article of my own, leave me alone!) Anyways, I have a suspicion that this could go a lot further, but I wanted to avoid falling into the trap of a long list of pointless military things (which would be so easy to produce). Any suggestions? Or is it OK as it is? -- 12:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)