Property | Value |
rdfs:label | - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Royal Pointless Military Things Tournament
|
rdfs:comment | - Hello, another re-write (no, I don't know if I'll ever actually start an article of my own, leave me alone!) Anyways, I have a suspicion that this could go a lot further, but I wanted to avoid falling into the trap of a long list of pointless military things (which would be so easy to produce). Any suggestions? Or is it OK as it is? -- 12:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
|
dcterms:subject | |
Mcomment | - marching in a cube...hehehe
|
Pcomment | - as anyone who's ever had an article reviewed by me knows, i love links. a lot. maybe sprinkle some more in.
|
Icomment | - the two are good, but given the length i think one more would be appropriate. i offer an image i made a while ago that might fit in nicely.
|
Pscore | |
Ccomment | - an excellent concept for an uncyc article
|
Cscore | |
Mscore | |
Hcomment | - after reading the title, i deemed this article to have huge lame potential, but it provided me with chuckle after chuckle
|
Iscore | |
Hscore | |
Fcomment | - your fears were unfounded, sir. i find your list to be funny rather than annoying, as it is relatively short and quite good. it currently stands as a solid rewrite. should you ever feel the need to expand it, maybe sections on specifics could be added, like most pointless technology or best military use of sea otter.
|
dbkwik:uncyclopedia/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
Signature | |
abstract | - Hello, another re-write (no, I don't know if I'll ever actually start an article of my own, leave me alone!) Anyways, I have a suspicion that this could go a lot further, but I wanted to avoid falling into the trap of a long list of pointless military things (which would be so easy to produce). Any suggestions? Or is it OK as it is? -- 12:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
|