PropertyValue
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/user:finnius/how2
rdfs:comment
  • I have finished a 1st draft. And would like to hear about any changes, additions, etc. Thanks everyone! Hey Finnius! Let's get started. -- 15:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
Mcomment
  • avg of all scores
Pcomment
  • nearly adequate. Lists, and other things. Please check my comments in Humor for the problems in grammar and so forth.
Icomment
  • Above average pictures except for poor old Monty up there . I'm not a good judge on pictures, so I don't know what kind of advice to give you. I think you need a picture up there, so getting rid of him and not replacing is a bad idea.
Pscore
  • 6
Ccomment
  • I like the idea of this. However, you lose points for various reasons: *Who the hell is the narrator? If there is no narrator, you shouldn't refer to the reader as "you". *Listy, very listy. At least it's not random. *It's just an explanation without much flava Here are some ideas: *Please give the narrator some character. Why is this guy an expert on starting cults?? *Cults through history section, maybe? *Examples, please! *Compare a cult to a famous religion? *Compare a cult to a country ?
Cscore
  • 6
Hcomment
  • avg of all the sections * 2 Step Right Up ' nearly adequate introduction, no "lol" factor. At least I know what the article is about. Now, what kind of advice do I give? Hmm... What is the source of all humor? I don't know, I think shortening it would be best. HowTo:Start A Religion isn't necessary. Skip those sentences. * 2.1 Understanding People ' I'm stupid so it took me a little bit of time to understand that first sentence . Why is the monty python introduction guy there?? Oh, man, you have a reference note, too. Again, I guess making it shorter would be okay, but it seems like this stuff is kinda necessary. Why is there a list? * 2.2 The Doctrine ' Adequate, but I'm starting to have an epiphany. Maybe it's really hard to have an explanation of something be funny! I know, because I just finished an article very similar to this in that it was an explanation. What this article needs is a running example of a cult in progress through the article. I'm confused as to who the narrator is, also. * 2.3 Create a need, and fill it ' Oh, poor form: it's just a list with an awkward paragraph in the middle! Tidy this up, and the funny would come shining through. * 2.4 The Details ' Ah, this part was fun. Still pretty lengthy and ugly, though. * 3.1 Two Choices ' That was clunky, and had weird grammar. I was about to say "perfect spelling and grammar" on this, but it is not so. * 3.1.1 The Typical Choice ' Adequate, I guess. I'm not sure how to make this more funny... I guess I'll just say get rid of the unnecessary parts, but I'm not even sure where that would be. * 3.1.2 An Alternative ' Above average lol factor. This gives me another epiphany, see concept. * 4 References Get rid of the reference. You don't need it: let people look up "obfuscate" for themselves.
Iscore
  • 7
Hscore
  • (6+5+7+5+8+6+7+8)/8 round1
Fcomment
  • Keep going on this project, it will get better with time. Don't get discouraged with my score, there are other people out there. Come by and see me sometime!
dbkwik:uncyclopedia/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
Signature
  • --11-07
abstract
  • I have finished a 1st draft. And would like to hear about any changes, additions, etc. Thanks everyone! Hey Finnius! Let's get started. -- 15:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)